----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Crocker" <[email protected]> > To: "Jim Popovitch" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 8:01:13 AM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] Mailing lists support for DMARC > > > > On 7/3/2012 9:02 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > The From: string will look like this: "Dave Crocker" > > <[email protected]> > ... > > One side affect of this, currently, is that it takes looking at the > > headers (which you can't do by browsing the mailman mailinglist > > acrhive) in order to see the posters real email address. > > This strikes me as a major negative.
This strikes me as a major positive: no email scrubbing possible > > > > On 7/4/2012 7:42 AM, Steve Atkins wrote: > >> On a practical level, rewriting the From: to be the list address > >> would make it difficult to reply to the author, as their email > >> address isn't going to be in any header that the MUA knows what to > >> do with. > > If I read the code correctly, the original author's address is added > to > the Reply-to. MUA support of reply-to is a bit variable, but > generally > it is supported. > > On the other hand, automatically adding the author's original From: > address to an existing Reply-To: field violates the intent of the > intended use of Reply-To: as an override of the From: field for > replies... > Who do you want to reply to? The Poster or the Author? Mailman already overrides the From field by a Reply-to in some cases and one is emotional about it. But what do you suggest should be done? _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
