John Levine wrote:
All too true. On my list of things to blog this weekend is a roundup
of the changes to list software that people have proposed, and why
none of them* will fix the damage caused by DMARC p=reject.
Looking forward to seeing that.
Of course, what would also be really of interest is a list of things
that might be done to get anybody involved in DMARC to actually undo the
damage at the core (e.g., i.e., de-spec p=reject, or at least not use
it). Back in the day, "social pressure" and market pressure actually
had some effect (some of us are old enough to remember when all the mail
systems in the world didn't interconnect - but once Compuserve connected
its mail system to the early Internet, or maybe it was the Source,
followed really quickly - no we're coming full circle to the bad old
days - mail system operators actively working to isolate their users
from others).
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
