>The reality is that "reply-to-list" vs. "reply-to-author" is both a >debate that has long ago reached religious proportions, and a pragmatic >consideration that varies from list to list.
What he said. >Most list management packages support both models, as a per-list >configuration item. My MLM (mj2) makes it a parameter of each individual subscription, so the subscriber can change it if she doesn't like the list's default. This is a religious argument that has gone on for decades, and isn't going to be resolved here. > Unfortunately, Yahoo has just broken both of them. All too true. On my list of things to blog this weekend is a roundup of the changes to list software that people have proposed, and why none of them* will fix the damage caused by DMARC p=reject. R's, John * - not even turning off all the features that modify messages on the way through _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
