On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 12:30 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > > There are still a lot of users, on both technical and non-technical > lists, that use reply-to-all because the reply button sends a message > to the author in stead of the list. There might be many reasons for > them to do that (they're stupid, ignorant, don't know their MUA, use a > MUA that doesn't provide a reply-to-list button, or something else I > couldn't come up with within 10 seconds), but it's still common > practise, and it has been annoying more experienced users.
Reply-to-list is a different issue, discussed in detail at http://david.woodhou.se/reply-to-list.html with some "sample users" and pros and cons. It's probably even more off-topic for this particular list :) > Also, I can see good reasoning in the simple concept: when I received > an e-mail from a private person and simply hit reply, I reply to the > person. When I received an e-mail from a discussion-list and simply > hit reply, I expect the reply to go to the discussion-list. The message came *via* the list. Not *from* it. Which, I think, is the point of much of this thread :) -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
