On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 07:47 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote: > On 4/12/2014 3:49 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 12:30 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > >> Also, I can see good reasoning in the simple concept: when I received > >> an e-mail from a private person and simply hit reply, I reply to the > >> person. When I received an e-mail from a discussion-list and simply > >> hit reply, I expect the reply to go to the discussion-list. > > > > The message came *via* the list. Not *from* it. > > > Therein likes the problem. The list took delivery of a message from the > author and then re-posted. A mailing list is not a mail relay. It > legally can make any change it wants to the message, because formally it > is posting a new message.
So it SHOULD have a new Message-ID: header, right? -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
