On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 06:40:29 -0400 Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday, August 01, 2014 10:46:08 Anders Wegge Keller via dmarc-discuss > wrote: >> Also, I fail to see how mailing lists could work otherwise, as they >> routinely change several of the signed header fields. > They don't. That's one of the major reasons why the IETF is considering > kicking off a new DMARC related working group. I can show you quite a lot of mailing lists, that do in fact add [Listname] to the subject field. When I post to a mailing list that add Sender and sign the mail with that DKIM-key, everything flows. On the other hand, if I just post to a mailing list that copies the message verbatim, I'm flooded with failure reports. So whatever you may think should happen, the reality is different. -- //Wegge _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
