On Aug 1, 2014, at 4:47 AM, Benny Pedersen via dmarc-discuss <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 1. aug. 2014 10.46.08 CEST, Anders Wegge Keller via dmarc-discuss > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; >> spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates \ >> 5.9.72.151 as permitted sender) [email protected]; > > spf uses envelope sender not from header, sender-id does use from header and > it fails, now microsoft admit there faults :) > > sender-id is not part of spf > >> dkim=pass [email protected] > > dkim uses from header with is signed so it can be checked in dmarc if both > spf and dkim is trusted > >> Also, I fail to see how mailing lists could work otherwise, as they >> routinely change several of the signed header fields. > > post on postfix maillist and see your own dmarc pass everytime, if others > maillists cant do that its not your fault > And this list change the subject, put a footer and other things and works well with DMARC. See options introduced since mailman 2.1.16, there is a whole range of customizations that fits a lot of needs. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
