On August 1, 2014 7:03:03 AM EDT, Anders Wegge Keller via dmarc-discuss <[email protected]> wrote: >On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 06:40:29 -0400 >Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Friday, August 01, 2014 10:46:08 Anders Wegge Keller via >dmarc-discuss >> wrote: > >>> Also, I fail to see how mailing lists could work otherwise, as they >>> routinely change several of the signed header fields. > >> They don't. That's one of the major reasons why the IETF is >considering >> kicking off a new DMARC related working group. > >I can show you quite a lot of mailing lists, that do in fact add >[Listname] >to the subject field. When I post to a mailing list that add Sender and >sign >the mail with that DKIM-key, everything flows. On the other hand, if I >just >post to a mailing list that copies the message verbatim, I'm flooded >with >failure reports. So whatever you may think should happen, the reality >is >different.
You read me backwards. They don't was short for they (mailing lists) don't generally work with DMARC. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
