Consider https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
- Roland ________________________________ From: dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org> on behalf of Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> Sent: Wednesday, 12 October 2016 16:32 To: Juri Haberland Cc: DMARC Discussion List Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] Beware of the size limit in DMARC URIs Hi, I hoped to get a reaction here of some sort from Microsoft, Google or Yahoo, but my mail might got burried underneath useless rants about DMARC and DNSSEC... Btw: Did anyone notice that AOL sends DMARC reports with two To: headers? Kind regards, Juri On 2016-10-04 09:21, Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss wrote: > Hi, > > while writing a patch for OpenDMARC, I stumbled accross problems with > the > size limit in DMARC URIs that some of the big players have. > > Microsoft cannot cope at all with an URI like "rep...@example.org!10m" > - > you won't receive a single report. > > Yahoo and Google do send a report and respect the size limit - as long > as > this URI is the only one in the rua tag. > As soon as one adds another URI (with or without size limit) to the rua > tag, Google and Yahoo forget to strip the size limit from the URI and > thus > try to send a mail to "rep...@example.org!10m"! > > As OpenDMARC also had problems with the size limit in older versions, > it is > best to avoid the use of size limits for now. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
