On 10/12/2016 3:31 AM, Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss wrote:
Let me clarify a bit -- the dmarc-discuss list is very much an appropriate forum for the kind of operational topic Juri raised. Implementation issues, operational questions/issues, etc -- all good for this list.
Yup.
But for things that appear to be more than that, the IETF WG is a better place to take them.
If it's likely a specification or even a BCP will be needed, the IETF list is where that needs to happen.
That said, it's not uncommon for an issue to first surface in a general list, such as dmarc-discuss, and only eventually get to the point where people decide it is going to need specification work. At that point, of course, it migrates.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
