On 10/12/2016 3:31 AM, Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss wrote:
Let me clarify a bit -- the dmarc-discuss list is very much an
appropriate forum for the kind of operational topic Juri raised.
Implementation issues, operational questions/issues, etc -- all good for
this list.


But for things that appear to be more than that, the IETF WG is a better
place to take them.

If it's likely a specification or even a BCP will be needed, the IETF list is where that needs to happen.

That said, it's not uncommon for an issue to first surface in a general list, such as dmarc-discuss, and only eventually get to the point where people decide it is going to need specification work. At that point, of course, it migrates.


  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
dmarc-discuss mailing list

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 

Reply via email to