On 2016-10-13 20:06, Matt Simerson via dmarc-discuss wrote:
This thread has been hijacked by the lack of reading comprehension.
Nobody (in this thread) has complained of DMARC reports being too
The problem in this thread is an issue with some DMARC report senders
failing to parse the DMARC URIs properly, if that DMARC URI includes
Right again. That's why I hesitated to re-post my findings on the IETF
For what it's worth, the largest report I ever got is ~2kB (compressed,
46kB uncompressed), but I run only a small system with a handful of
users and lists. Would be interesting to hear what sizes larger sites
receive (or send), but I doubt it gets into the region of ~1MB
(compressed) - if the sender has a decent implementation (which
OpenDMARC currently has not).
So again: Some report senders do not parse reporting URIs correct -
please check your implementations... That was my point.
dmarc-discuss mailing list
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms