> On 14 Dec 2020, at 15:10, Dave Crocker <dcroc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 12/12/2020 10:51 AM, John R Levine wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Dec 2020, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>>> p=reject: all mail sent from this domain should be aligned in a DMARC
>>>> compliant way. We believe that unaligned mail is from unauthorized
>>>> senders so we ask receivers to reject it, even though that might mean
>>>> some of our authorized senders' mail is rejected too.
>>> 
>>> As soon as this specification text, here, contains language about how this 
>>> information is to be used, should be used, or could be used, it crosses 
>>> over into creating confusion about expectations of receiver handling.
>> 
>> I agree with you, which is why I said "believe" and "request".
> 
> Except that that runs contrary to my point, rather than being compatible with 
> it.
> 
> Any an all discussion of receiver /use/ of DMARC needs to be moved to a 
> separate section and it needs to refrain from any linguistic form that 
> characterizes
> that use as being in response to domain owner desires.

‘As a matter of policy we treat all unaligned mail as unauthorized use of our 
domain.’ 

I am agnostic about moving the ‘what to do’ section. I think it makes sense to 
keep the sender definitions and the ways receivers can interpret those 
declarations close together. 

>> If we're going to have any description of p=none at all it needs to 
>> emphasize the point that it's telling you that they consider the messages 
>> unusually unimportant.  This appears to be at odds with what some DMARC 
>> users believe.
> 
> It isn't about the 'importance' of the messages.  It is about the domain 
> owner's view of the implication of the success or failure of DMARC validation.

The current p=reject is that the domain owner’s view is that the mail is 
unauthorized. And, according to discussion here on the IETF list, we are to 
presume that every domain owner knows exactly what they are doing and that 
every company understands the implications of a p=reject policy statement. 

laura 

-- 
Having an Email Crisis?  We can help! 800 823-9674 

Laura Atkins
Word to the Wise
la...@wordtothewise.com
(650) 437-0741          

Email Delivery Blog: https://wordtothewise.com/blog     







_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to