On Sat, 12 Dec 2020, Dave Crocker wrote:
p=reject: all mail sent from this domain should be aligned in a DMARC
compliant way. We believe that unaligned mail is from unauthorized
senders so we ask receivers to reject it, even though that might mean
some of our authorized senders' mail is rejected too.
As soon as this specification text, here, contains language about how this
information is to be used, should be used, or could be used, it crosses over
into creating confusion about expectations of receiver handling.
I agree with you, which is why I said "believe" and "request".
If we're going to have any description of p=none at all it needs to
emphasize the point that it's telling you that they consider the messages
unusually unimportant. This appears to be at odds with what some DMARC
users believe.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
