On 12/14/20 10:09 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 12/14/2020 10:00 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
When we tell you it's not a problem,
Except that the telling was by you. Alone.
And you've yet to respond to the observable fact that receivers have
been ignoring the directive language.
Or that many folk misunderstand the semantics of DKIM, thinking it
means that message authorship is validated.
I'll ignore the whataboutism, but point out that you have never produced
one piece of evidence where the language of p=reject or any of the other
previous labels has caused software design decisions to change for the
worst. I don't even know what would qualify as a mistake. So yes, I'll
take my direct experience of writing code over your indirect innuendo
any day.
Mike
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
