On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 8:00 AM Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Compare that with the move to https everywhere. Having to get > certificates and > > encrypting and decrypting all stuff is certainly not an interoperability > > improvement. > > Say WHAT? There's no interoperability issue there. > > There's some effort involved in doing it, and one has to weigh that > effort against what one gets out of it. But it interoperates just > fine once you make the effort. It's not the same thing at all. > > Barry > Hmm, let's apply this to DMARC. " But it interoperates just fine once you make the effort." Nobody forces a Sender to publish a DMARC record. Nobody forces a receiver to validate DMARC. Nobody forces mailing lists to accept mail from domains which publish a DMARC record let alone one which publishes p=reject policy. But it interoperates just fine once you make the effort. Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
