On Fri 31/Mar/2023 04:10:10 +0200 John Levine wrote:
It appears that Todd Herr <[email protected]> said:
I'm on board with telling those deploying DMARC what interoperability
problems can be caused by a choice of p=reject, but I'm not on board with
telling them not to do that.
I take your point, but IETF's job is interoperability. We've never been
very interested in people's assertions about what they think other people
should do, even when the assertions are often sensible.
Compare that with the move to https everywhere. Having to get certificates and
encrypting and decrypting all stuff is certainly not an interoperability
improvement.
Instead during the present discussion there is a tendency to prioritize
interoperability w.r.t. domain owners "interests", as if that interest wasn't
security.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
