On December 1, 2024 6:09:01 PM UTC, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sun, 1 Dec 2024, Daniel K. wrote: >> The 24 hour reporting period is overwhelming, followed by the 1 hour >> reporting period orders of magnitude behind. > >I believe it. > >> Based on this data I have no qualms about recommending a 24 hour >> reporting period starting at UTC midnight, as in RFC 7489. > >I still do not understand what problem this is supposed to solve. Let's >imagine that people decided to send every three hours, or every seven hours. >or every 10 hours and 42 minutes. So what?
My guess is that the "problem" is that tools that display the data aggregate things into buckets by day/week/month and particularly when aggregated into "day" buckets the variations make the data look lumpy and inconsistent. I don't think this is a protocol problem that we should be trying to solve. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
