Hi Brian,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:43 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
> 
> Hi Fred,
> 
> On 6/18/14 11:25 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> > Hi Jouni,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:00 AM
> >> To: Templin, Fred L; [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
> >>
> >> Fred,
> >>
> >> It is true IPv4 is there (and will be for a long time). Although the
> >> charter does emphasize IPv6 as the base solution it does not prohibit
> >> adding IPv4 support. It is just we can accept an IPv6-only solution as a
> >> valid & complete solution from DMM point of view.
> >
> > However, a solution that works equally well whether the access networks
> > are IPv6-only, dual-stack, or IPv4-only has clear advantages in terms
> > of near-term deployment in real networks. Therefore, I think the charter
> > is currently saying _too much_. My new proposal is simply to strike the
> > following two sentences:
> >
> >   "DMM solutions are primarily targeted at IPv6 deployments and
> >    should not be required to support IPv4, specifically in situations
> >    where private IPv4 addresses and/or NATs are used.  IPv6 is
> >    assumed to be present in both the mobile host/router and the
> >    access networks."
> >
> 
> The above has been a part of the DMM charter for a long time.  Taking it
> out would appear to be opening the door for IPv4-only solutions.

IPv4-only solutions is not my intended meaning. I agree that the
mobile hosts/routers should only support IPv6 applications (and
not IPv4 apps) but that support can be enabled over either IPv6
or IPv4 access networks through tunneling. 

> My
> assessment of the winds within the community is that people are not
> interested in new protocols for IPv4.

No, this is not a new protocol for IPv4. It is IPv6 Neighbor
Discovery over tunnels over either IPv6 or IPv4 access networks.

Thanks - Fred
[email protected]

> Just my opinion...
> 
> Brian

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to