Fred,
6/16/2014 5:59 PM, Templin, Fred L kirjoitti:
Hi Jouni,
What about operation in IPv4-only access networks? There may be
many enterprise networks that offer IPv4-only in their access
networks for the near future, but with IPv6 enabled internally.
For them, we should be able to tunnel IPv6 inside IPv4 if the
mechanism can support it.
My personal view is still that IPv4-only access is even more past than
"anchoring" ;-)
Anyway, if there is (rough) consensus in the WG for the below new text,
so be it.
- Jouni
Here is my suggested re-word:
OLD:
DMM solutions are primarily targeted at IPv6 deployments and
should not be required to support IPv4, specifically in situations
where private IPv4 addresses and/or NATs are used. IPv6 is
assumed to be present in both the mobile host/router and the
access networks.
NEW:
DMM solutions are primarily targeted at IPv6 mobile hosts/routers
and should not be required to support IPv4-only mobiles. Access
networks may be IPv6-enabled or IPv4-only, but with IPv6 enabled
in the network core.
Thanks - Fred
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 4:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Folks,
Another set of tweaks in github (v12):
o reminders of Charlie's comments
o Hidetoshi's comments
o Georgios' comments
Also milestones got postponed. There is still a bit of my own editing in
the text so not everything got moved over letter by letter.
- Jouni
6/13/2014 2:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
New update (v9) available. I added most of the editorials from Charlie
(thanks) and the red texts from Alper.
The lot debated anchoring term (and milestone) is still there. The
milestone does not mention anymore about preserving the mobility
sessions and stuff. That would be up to the solution to define.
- Jouni
6/6/2014 2:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
Minor changes..
https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt
IMHO..the charter as it is today, would allow pretty much any solution
from legacy anchoring to herd of pigeons carrying IP.. ;-)
I have put in editorial changes of my own and clear text proposals
received from others.
- Jouni
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
