Hi,
6/14/2014 8:59 AM, [email protected] kirjoitti:
Hi Jouni, Hi all,
Sorry for not being able to attend the telco.
I have checked the updated charter. It looks good, but I have some comments:
Comment_1:
Not sure which of the mentioned milestones incorporate traffic steering after
re-anchoring.
Is it the milestone "Forwarding path and signalling management" or is it the milestone
"Enhanced mobility anchoring"?
The latter. It was also stipulated that in a good case "Forwarding path
and signalling management" could also be used for traffic steering for
anchor switch.. or then both could be entirely separate solutions.
A sentence similar to below, could be included in one of these two work items
to emphasize this:
"The steering of the traffic associated with the "mid-session mobility anchor
switching" is also in the scope of this work item."
Ok.. works for me.
Comment_2: virtualization should be, IMHO, better emphasized in the charter.
For example, could we change the following paragraph from:
And we have an other mail saying it does not need to be mentioned ;)
"The DMM solutions should not distinguish between physical or virtualised
networking functions.
However, whenever applicable, clarifications for specific networking function
deployment models are in scope and encouraged."
INTO:
"The DMM solutions should not distinguish between physical or virtualised
networking functions.
However, whenever applicable, clarifications and additional
features/capabilities for specific networking function deployment models,
e.g., in virtualized environments, are in scope and encouraged. "
OK with that.
Comment_3: The milestones are too ambitious.
Please extend each of them with at least 3 months.
Ack.
Thanks,
Jouni
Best regards,
Georgios
________________________________________
Van: dmm [[email protected]] namens Jouni Korhonen [[email protected]]
Verzonden: vrijdag 13 juni 2014 13:41
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Folks,
New update (v9) available. I added most of the editorials from Charlie
(thanks) and the red texts from Alper.
The lot debated anchoring term (and milestone) is still there. The
milestone does not mention anymore about preserving the mobility
sessions and stuff. That would be up to the solution to define.
- Jouni
6/6/2014 2:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
Minor changes..
https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt
IMHO..the charter as it is today, would allow pretty much any solution
from legacy anchoring to herd of pigeons carrying IP.. ;-)
I have put in editorial changes of my own and clear text proposals
received from others.
- Jouni
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
