Hi Jouni, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 9:41 AM > To: Templin, Fred L; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github.. > > Fred, > > 6/16/2014 5:59 PM, Templin, Fred L kirjoitti: > > Hi Jouni, > > > > What about operation in IPv4-only access networks? There may be > > many enterprise networks that offer IPv4-only in their access > > networks for the near future, but with IPv6 enabled internally. > > For them, we should be able to tunnel IPv6 inside IPv4 if the > > mechanism can support it. > > My personal view is still that IPv4-only access is even more past than > "anchoring" ;-)
OK, but I am just telling what I see and it is that IPv4-only access in enterprise networks is still a reality today. Thanks - Fred [email protected] > Anyway, if there is (rough) consensus in the WG for the below new text, > so be it. > > - Jouni > > > > > > Here is my suggested re-word: > > > > OLD: > > DMM solutions are primarily targeted at IPv6 deployments and > > should not be required to support IPv4, specifically in situations > > where private IPv4 addresses and/or NATs are used. IPv6 is > > assumed to be present in both the mobile host/router and the > > access networks. > > > > NEW: > > DMM solutions are primarily targeted at IPv6 mobile hosts/routers > > and should not be required to support IPv4-only mobiles. Access > > networks may be IPv6-enabled or IPv4-only, but with IPv6 enabled > > in the network core. > > > > Thanks - Fred > > [email protected] > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen > >> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 4:20 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github.. > >> > >> Folks, > >> > >> Another set of tweaks in github (v12): > >> o reminders of Charlie's comments > >> o Hidetoshi's comments > >> o Georgios' comments > >> > >> Also milestones got postponed. There is still a bit of my own editing in > >> the text so not everything got moved over letter by letter. > >> > >> - Jouni > >> > >> > >> > >> 6/13/2014 2:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti: > >>> Folks, > >>> > >>> New update (v9) available. I added most of the editorials from Charlie > >>> (thanks) and the red texts from Alper. > >>> > >>> The lot debated anchoring term (and milestone) is still there. The > >>> milestone does not mention anymore about preserving the mobility > >>> sessions and stuff. That would be up to the solution to define. > >>> > >>> - Jouni > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> 6/6/2014 2:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti: > >>>> Folks, > >>>> > >>>> Minor changes.. > >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> IMHO..the charter as it is today, would allow pretty much any solution > >>>> from legacy anchoring to herd of pigeons carrying IP.. ;-) > >>>> > >>>> I have put in editorial changes of my own and clear text proposals > >>>> received from others. > >>>> > >>>> - Jouni > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dmm mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
