Hi Jouni, Hi all, Sorry for not being able to attend the telco.
I have checked the updated charter. It looks good, but I have some comments: Comment_1: Not sure which of the mentioned milestones incorporate traffic steering after re-anchoring. Is it the milestone "Forwarding path and signalling management" or is it the milestone "Enhanced mobility anchoring"? A sentence similar to below, could be included in one of these two work items to emphasize this: "The steering of the traffic associated with the "mid-session mobility anchor switching" is also in the scope of this work item." Comment_2: virtualization should be, IMHO, better emphasized in the charter. For example, could we change the following paragraph from: "The DMM solutions should not distinguish between physical or virtualised networking functions. However, whenever applicable, clarifications for specific networking function deployment models are in scope and encouraged." INTO: "The DMM solutions should not distinguish between physical or virtualised networking functions. However, whenever applicable, clarifications and additional features/capabilities for specific networking function deployment models, e.g., in virtualized environments, are in scope and encouraged. " Comment_3: The milestones are too ambitious. Please extend each of them with at least 3 months. Best regards, Georgios ________________________________________ Van: dmm [[email protected]] namens Jouni Korhonen [[email protected]] Verzonden: vrijdag 13 juni 2014 13:41 Aan: [email protected] Onderwerp: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github.. Folks, New update (v9) available. I added most of the editorials from Charlie (thanks) and the red texts from Alper. The lot debated anchoring term (and milestone) is still there. The milestone does not mention anymore about preserving the mobility sessions and stuff. That would be up to the solution to define. - Jouni 6/6/2014 2:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti: > Folks, > > Minor changes.. > > https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt > > IMHO..the charter as it is today, would allow pretty much any solution > from legacy anchoring to herd of pigeons carrying IP.. ;-) > > I have put in editorial changes of my own and clear text proposals > received from others. > > - Jouni _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
