All The authors took the advice from the working group and extracted the more common features into a separate document. The chairs would like the working group to give some comments, as we feel a document like this should be considered for adoption.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pp-dprive-common-features/ https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pp-dprive-common-features-01.txt Please read and comment on this draft. thanks tim ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> Date: Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:59 PM Subject: [dns-privacy] New draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative and draft-pp-dprive-common-features To: dpr...@ietf.org <dpr...@ietf.org> Greetings again. Peter and I have revised draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative and draft-pp-dprive-common-features based on recent mailing list traffic. One major change is that we realized that we could move even more sections from unauth-to-authoritative to common-features because they would apply to the fully-authenticated use case. Please review them to see if you agree. If people like the idea of us splitting out common features, it would be good if it too became a WG document, particularly to help focus the discussions on the unauthenticated and fully-authenticated use cases. --Paul Hoffman and Peter van Dijk https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pp-dprive-common-features-01.txt https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative-01.txt _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
