On May 25, 2021, at 5:09 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > The fundamental question here is whether we want to build a mechanism for > authenticated ADoX or not
It might be better to think of this as "whether we want to build a mechanism for fully-authenticated ADoX now, but if not now, allow for it to be done easily in the future". Others on the list have already said that they are interested in unauthenticated as a stepping stone to later going to full authentication. The purpose of the proposed -common-features draft is to make such fully-authenticated mechanism(s) easily definable regardless of when the WG wants to do so. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
