On Aug 13, 2022, at 3:32 PM, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> i suggest that we adopt the technology "domain names (which is a concept that 
> precedes DNS itself)" whenever we are trying to talk about the name space as 
> distinct from the protocol.
> 

The term "domain name" is already defined in RFC 8499. If you don't like that 
definition, please suggest changes that will find consensus in the WG.

Note that the definition says nothing about dots. Dots are part of the 
presentation format for domain names but are, of course, not part of the names 
themselves.

--Paul Hoffman

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to