On 14/08/2022 02:55, David Conrad wrote:
As John Levine points out, this isn’t a technology issue: it is social/politica/economic/bureaucratic
I believe the above statement is incorrect in referring to "this" issue in the singular. There is more than one thing in play here and ignoring all but one aspect seems to me fairly guaranteed to lead to discussion based on premises that are false, or not agreed among the participants. There are certainly non-technical parts of these discussions. But, there are also what ought be almost purely technical parts, and IMO the correct handling of such a niche thing as a namespace the GNU people would like to use (without DNS) is one of those technical discussions. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
