On 7/31/07, Alan Coopersmh <alan.coopersmith at sun.com> wrote: > > Pg. 7: "Relevance" - Do you mean 2007, not 2008? > > Pg. 14: x64 is not just AMD any more - change "AMD x64" to just "x64"? > > Pg. 17: OpenGrok - should Mercurial be added to the list? > > Pg. 20: ZFS - haven't they dropped the "Zettabyte" name? (If not, > shouldn't it be spelled the same as on pg. 24?) > > Pg. 50: URL for NWAM info has visible formatting tags in it. > > Pg. 57: "Prebuilt OpenSolaris distributions are limited to SX:CR" > - old name for SX:CE > - what about Belenix? Nexenta? Schillix? Martux? SX:DE? > > Pg. 57: Memory requirements - should it mention the 768 Mb requirement > for the Developer installer?
And how to get around that, as you really don't need that much memory to run it, just to install it... (There are workarounds if I recall) Module 8: Much of what is described is specific to the ON community, > not the rest of OpenSolaris - it should be clearly labeled as > such. > > Pg. 66: The last 2 paragraphs about Perl's POSIX.pod seems out of > place - what does it have to do with the kernel threading model? > > > Pg. 106: Mozilla has been removed from Solaris/OpenSolaris - should this > example use firefox instead? First let me say, I like the doc... I think it will be very useful for more than just the Educational sector... I think it should eventually include more consolidations. The only thing I found so far, it that there are vertical marks on the right hand side of many pages. (Actually there seem to be vertical markings on the left as well) Cheers, Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/docs-discuss/attachments/20070801/2da94818/attachment.html>
