On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:27, Marc Paré <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 2011-06-23 02:30, David Nelson a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> My 2 cents would be that the best format for guides is .odt, plus a >> publication of the user-ready version in PDF. >> >> I don't think an HTML version would really be a useful idea. >> >> -- >> David Nelson >> > I will chime in as well. I would rather see the ODF versions first and the > .pdf only if needed. We are, after all, telling people that we have the best > office suite on earth, so let's prove it! It does work!. I would even go as > far as not publishing any .pdf versions. People needing documentation will > have LibreOffice to read the ODF files. I would only supply .pdf files if it > involved anything with the installation of LibreOffice. > > Cheers > > Marc
Marc, please see my earlier note about the importance and necessity of providing PDFs. --Jean -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
