Hi On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 17:09 +0200, C wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 16:55, Nino Novak <[email protected]> wrote: > > So my statement would be: > > Stay with ODF as master (as long as there is not a more conveniant > > solution) and try to offer PDF /and/ HTML in addition. Ideally, the PDF > > and HTML conversion should be done as automatically as possible, so no > > need for additional manpower. > > You've hit in an important point Nino. The doc team does not have the > manpower available to create and maintain independent documentation > streams. HTML is a fine idea, but not as a leading/primary format. > If there is a need for HTML, then do it as an output/publishing format > from the ODT sources. > > Clayton > Generation of pdf is easy for LO, under FILE >> Export as PDF in Writer and you have your pdf. I would do this after the document has been finalized for release. We can plug this feature, saying something "pdf files where generated using LO ...." This will tell people the can generate a pdf file for LO without having to prep it for import into Acrobat or use Acrobat to generate the document. When friends ask about getting Acrobat, I tell them to use the export feature in LO/OOo instead and save the money. The feature has been OOo for several years and is one of the reasons I would use OOo and now LO. -- Jay Lozier [email protected] -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
