On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 16:55, Nino Novak <[email protected]> wrote: > So my statement would be: > Stay with ODF as master (as long as there is not a more conveniant > solution) and try to offer PDF /and/ HTML in addition. Ideally, the PDF > and HTML conversion should be done as automatically as possible, so no > need for additional manpower.
You've hit in an important point Nino. The doc team does not have the manpower available to create and maintain independent documentation streams. HTML is a fine idea, but not as a leading/primary format. If there is a need for HTML, then do it as an output/publishing format from the ODT sources. Clayton -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
