That was what I was thinking.  Knowing what I know about manufacturing, I 
couldn't see a group of people hand-selecting slug segments to make them all as 
identical as possible - which is probably why each PTO has those SAT components.

I can remember doing some production testing long ago, where you had to install 
components (usually resistors) to get the device bang-on.

Given that we hams nowadays have many more ways of determining our frequency, I 
don't consider it a tragedy if the PTO is out a kc or two.  

73,

Steve, W1ES/4

-----Original Message-----
>From: Curt Nixon <[email protected]>
>Sent: Nov 4, 2011 7:05 AM
>To: Steve Wedge <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected], Paul Gerhardt <[email protected]>, 
>[email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Drake PTO Repair Question
>
>I know from trying it that one will play in the other, but...here it 
>comes, drumroll.....the linearity will not be right.  I isn't bad enough 
>to call it a junker, but may not be in spec from end to end.  Not sure 
>if there are "light" perm cores intermixed or what, but something is 
>different from rod assy to rod assy.  I never dissected the problem any 
>further than trying it.
>
>Curt
>
>Steve Wedge wrote:
>> So, is there any interchangeability with these rods, or does losing 
>> this part of the PTO render all of it a junker?
>>
>> I remember Garey mentioning that the whole assembly is rather 
>> precisely-matched.  I'm sure there's some variability in the ferrite 
>> and in all those mechanical connections.
>>
>> I was so glad when we found out the problem in my problem PTO was a 
>> capacitor, because I was afraid the problem was going to be in the rod.
>>
>> Steve Wedge, W1ES/4
>>
>> "I can't complain, but sometimes I still do."
>> - Joe Walsh
>>
>> If the above message appears, it came from Steve's Son of Laptop!
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Curt Nixon" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "Paul Gerhardt" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 8:39 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Drake PTO Repair Question
>>
>>
>>> I think he was asking about the fork to slug rod connection.  It is 
>>> definitely soldered on the ones I have here.  Glue or JB weld epoxy 
>>> is not a good choice since the slug rod is grounded through the fork 
>>> to the guide rod.  A loose slug rod connection will definitely be a 
>>> jumping issue.
>>> Re-soldering seems the only proper solution.
>>>
>>> The theads are just for the screw to fork..  The slug Rod to fork, in 
>>> the middle, is soldered.  Should be no threads there. But it will 
>>> require the slug rod be removed from the assembly which means a 
>>> complete field strip of the entire assembly.  I would not try to 
>>> solder it while in situ.
>>>
>>> Curt
>>>
>>> Garey Barrell wrote:
>>>> The fork  _IS_  threaded!
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps I misunderstood your problem.   The fork is NOT fixed to the 
>>>> tuning shaft.  The shaft rotates and the fork is driven back and 
>>>> forth by the threads??????
>>>>
>>>> IF the fork is solidly affixed to the shaft, the shaft can't turn!!
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> 73, Garey - K4OAH
>>>> St Charles, IL
>>>>
>>>> Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
>>>> and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
>>>> <www.k4oah.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paul Gerhardt wrote:
>>>>> http://www.wb4hfn.com/DRAKE/DrakeArticles/TechTips/PTO-Repair.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> The above link answered most of my questions.
>>>>>
>>>>> The end of the rod is threaded with solder on it and the fork is not
>>>>> threaded so my last remaining question is; how was the tuning rod
>>>>> affixed to the 'fork'.  Would it be better to;
>>>>>          1. Use glue like JB Weld or Super Glue
>>>>>           2.  put more solder on the threads of the rod and press fit
>>>>> it back on with a hammer
>>>>>           3.  put more solder on the threads AND the fork soldering
>>>>> them together.
>>>>>
>>>>> Opt 1 would be the easest and safest method it seems...??
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Drakelist mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Drakelist mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist 
>>
>>


_______________________________________________
Drakelist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist

Reply via email to