On 2002.02.25 10:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... > > Some good news, just when I'm away from school! (and its great connection > :) ). > But just a thought: it looks like you use the "standard" host.def for the > > mach64 build. And the last time I checked out the branch, the #define > MesaUse3DNow YES line wasnt in the host.def file (cant check now, since I > only > have windoze to surf) > Since the mach64 isnt powerful, all optimisations are welcome. Are there > real > performance differences if one can use this option (personnally, I've got > an > athlon4)? > > Anyway, if there's an increase in fps, I'll continue to update/recompile > the > mach64 branch (at least at school) with all optimisations possible, so if > > anyone is interested in athlon-compiled binary drivers, I can help (but > not > before march 4th). > > Regards, > > Bernard Cafarelli
I think that there is no reason for not enabling every optimization in Mesa on CVS, since the processor abilities are checked on runtime. Does anyone see a problem with this? Regards, José Fonseca _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
