On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:47:07AM +0000, José Fonseca wrote: > On 2002.02.25 10:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > anyone is interested in athlon-compiled binary drivers, I can help (but > > not > > before march 4th). > > I think that there is no reason for not enabling every optimization in > Mesa on CVS, since the processor abilities are checked on runtime. > > Does anyone see a problem with this?
There are two parts to this. There is the assembly coded parts of Mesa (for 3Dnow & SSE) and there are compile switches for GCC. For example, we may wish to see if there are any benefits to building a version with '-mcpu=i686' or '-mcpu=k6' or ... in host.def. If the performance difference is neglegable, then we might at least consider changing the option to '-mcpu=i486 -march=i686'. Are 80386 or 80486 CPUs even supported by DRI? Heh..."So I put my PCI Radeon DDR in with my 486SX 20, and RtCW wouldn't run because I only had 8MB..." :) -- Tell that to the Marines! _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
