Quoting Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There are two parts to this. There is the assembly coded parts of Mesa > (for 3Dnow & SSE) and there are compile switches for GCC. For example, we may > wish to see if there are any benefits to building a version with > '-mcpu=i686' or '-mcpu=k6' or ... in host.def. If the performance > difference is neglegable, then we might at least consider changing the > option to '-mcpu=i486 -march=i686'. Are 80386 or 80486 CPUs even supported > by DRI? Heh..."So I put my PCI Radeon DDR in with my 486SX 20, and RtCW > wouldn't run because I only had 8MB..." :) > > -- > Tell that to the Marines! Looks like we need some benchmarking :) Also, gcc accepts many options: for example my CFLAGS is 3 lines long (thanks to a linux mag -french edition- dealing about gcc optimisation)... like ffast-math,... Can some of them be useful for "gearing up" the dri? Regards, Bernard Cafarelli (love this email ending thanks Jose! :) ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
