+1 for maven. Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility we're after.
On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" <[email protected]> wrote: >I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy. > > >On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> >wrote: >> What is wrong with good old Ant? >> I can live with maven too... it just has too many gotchas >> >> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1 for maven. >>> Could those against please suggest alternatives? >>> Thank you >>> Julien >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> >>>> -1 for maven. >>>> >>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > If build system is evil it's better to build it manually. >>>> > -1 for maven >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas < >>>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the >>>> >> > build >>>> >> system for drill? >>>> >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). >>>> >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. >>>> >> >>>> >> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like it >>>> downloads >>>> >> half of the Internet every time). >>>> >> >>>> >> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala + SBT >>>> >> [1]? >>>> >> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive ;) >>>> >> >>>> >> Cheers, >>>> >> Michael >>>> >> >>>> >> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/ >>>> >> >>>> >> -- >>>> >> Michael Hausenblas >>>> >> Ireland, Europe >>>> >> http://mhausenblas.info/ >>>> >> >>>> >> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the >>>> >> > build >>>> >> system for drill? >>>> >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). >>>> >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > -david >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> >> I see classes in the source tree: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>>>https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/ >>>>parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr >>>>qlantlr/autogen >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source code >>>>into >>>> an >>>> >> >> antler source tree. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov >>>> >> >> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> Still work in progress, but anyway - >>>> >> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from my mobile device >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Sent from my mobile device > > > >-- >Vladimir Klimontovich >Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich >
