You should read the dremel and dryad papers that Jason sent out a while ago.

See https://github.com/ApacheDrill/Brainstorm/wiki/Apache-Drill-Links

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:46 AM, NAVEEN MAANJU <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Camuel.
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This is OpenDremel's team suggestion for one:
> > http://www.slideshare.net/CamuelGilyadov/presentations
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Michael Hausenblas <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture?
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I was about to ask re this as well - pretty please, with sugar on top
> of
> > > it? ;)
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >            Michael
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michael Hausenblas
> > > Ireland, Europe
> > > http://mhausenblas.info/
> > >
> > > On 13 Sep 2012, at 15:23, NAVEEN MAANJU wrote:
> > >
> > > > any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture?
> > > >
> > > > +1 maven
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Arun Yadav <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 for maven however, would welcome better option if any.
> > > >> On Sep 13, 2012 2:45 AM, "Ben Flint" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1 for maven.  Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility
> > we're
> > > >>> after.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" <
> [email protected]>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>> What is wrong with good old Ant?
> > > >>>>> I can live with maven too...   it just has too many gotchas
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> +1 for maven.
> > > >>>>>> Could those against please suggest alternatives?
> > > >>>>>> Thank you
> > > >>>>>> Julien
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov <
> > [email protected]>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> -1 for maven.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> If build system is evil it's better to build it manually.
> > > >>>>>>>> -1 for maven
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas <
> > > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about
> > the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> build
> > > >>>>>>>>> system for drill?
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO).
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like
> it
> > > >>>>>>> downloads
> > > >>>>>>>>> half of the Internet every time).
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala
> +
> > > >> SBT
> > > >>>>>>>>> [1]?
> > > >>>>>>>>> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive
> > ;)
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>>>           Michael
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>> Michael Hausenblas
> > > >>>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
> > > >>>>>>>>> http://mhausenblas.info/
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about
> > the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> build
> > > >>>>>>>>> system for drill?
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO).
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> -david
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning <
> > > >> [email protected]>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I see classes in the source tree:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr
> > > >>>>>>> qlantlr/autogen
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source
> > code
> > > >>>>>>> into
> > > >>>>>>> an
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> antler source tree.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Still work in progress, but anyway -
> > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>> Sent from my mobile device
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Vladimir Klimontovich
> > > >>>> Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to