> You should read the dremel and dryad papers that Jason sent out a while ago.
Let's assume I've read all the papers. Wasn't there a (soft) ETA for some
design slides proposal from the MapR side (or maybe I'm mixing up stuff??)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Hausenblas
Ireland, Europe
http://mhausenblas.info/
On 13 Sep 2012, at 17:51, Ted Dunning wrote:
> You should read the dremel and dryad papers that Jason sent out a while ago.
>
> See https://github.com/ApacheDrill/Brainstorm/wiki/Apache-Drill-Links
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:46 AM, NAVEEN MAANJU <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Camuel.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> This is OpenDremel's team suggestion for one:
>>> http://www.slideshare.net/CamuelGilyadov/presentations
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Michael Hausenblas <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture?
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> I was about to ask re this as well - pretty please, with sugar on top
>> of
>>>> it? ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Hausenblas
>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>> http://mhausenblas.info/
>>>>
>>>> On 13 Sep 2012, at 15:23, NAVEEN MAANJU wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture?
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 maven
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Arun Yadav <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for maven however, would welcome better option if any.
>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2012 2:45 AM, "Ben Flint" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for maven. Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility
>>> we're
>>>>>>> after.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" <
>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <
>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What is wrong with good old Ant?
>>>>>>>>> I can live with maven too... it just has too many gotchas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for maven.
>>>>>>>>>> Could those against please suggest alternatives?
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>> Julien
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov <
>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -1 for maven.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> If build system is evil it's better to build it manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 for maven
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about
>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>> system for drill?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like
>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> downloads
>>>>>>>>>>>>> half of the Internet every time).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala
>> +
>>>>>> SBT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive
>>> ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Hausenblas
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://mhausenblas.info/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about
>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>> system for drill?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -david
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning <
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see classes in the source tree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr
>>>>>>>>>>> qlantlr/autogen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source
>>> code
>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> antler source tree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still work in progress, but anyway -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Vladimir Klimontovich
>>>>>>>> Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
