+1 with maven only since it's familiar and can live with the gotchas. Will be great to see a better alternative.
Tim On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Ben Flint <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for maven. Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility we're > after. > > On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy. > > > > > >On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> > >wrote: > >> What is wrong with good old Ant? > >> I can live with maven too... it just has too many gotchas > >> > >> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> +1 for maven. > >>> Could those against please suggest alternatives? > >>> Thank you > >>> Julien > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> > >>>wrote: > >>> > >>>> -1 for maven. > >>>> > >>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > If build system is evil it's better to build it manually. > >>>> > -1 for maven > >>>> > > >>>> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas < > >>>> > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the > >>>> >> > build > >>>> >> system for drill? > >>>> >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). > >>>> >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like it > >>>> downloads > >>>> >> half of the Internet every time). > >>>> >> > >>>> >> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala + SBT > >>>> >> [1]? > >>>> >> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive ;) > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Cheers, > >>>> >> Michael > >>>> >> > >>>> >> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/ > >>>> >> > >>>> >> -- > >>>> >> Michael Hausenblas > >>>> >> Ireland, Europe > >>>> >> http://mhausenblas.info/ > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the > >>>> >> > build > >>>> >> system for drill? > >>>> >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). > >>>> >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > -david > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> >> I see classes in the source tree: > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> > https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/ > >>>>parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr > >>>>qlantlr/autogen > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source code > >>>>into > >>>> an > >>>> >> >> antler source tree. > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov > >>>> >> >> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >>> Still work in progress, but anyway - > >>>> >> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Sent from my mobile device > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Sent from my mobile device > > > > > > > >-- > >Vladimir Klimontovich > >Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich > > > >
