any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture? +1 maven
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Arun Yadav <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for maven however, would welcome better option if any. > On Sep 13, 2012 2:45 AM, "Ben Flint" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 for maven. Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility we're > > after. > > > > On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy. > > > > > > > > >On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> > > >wrote: > > >> What is wrong with good old Ant? > > >> I can live with maven too... it just has too many gotchas > > >> > > >> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> +1 for maven. > > >>> Could those against please suggest alternatives? > > >>> Thank you > > >>> Julien > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> > > >>>wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> -1 for maven. > > >>>> > > >>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > If build system is evil it's better to build it manually. > > >>>> > -1 for maven > > >>>> > > > >>>> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas < > > >>>> > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the > > >>>> >> > build > > >>>> >> system for drill? > > >>>> >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). > > >>>> >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like it > > >>>> downloads > > >>>> >> half of the Internet every time). > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala + > SBT > > >>>> >> [1]? > > >>>> >> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive ;) > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> Cheers, > > >>>> >> Michael > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/ > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> -- > > >>>> >> Michael Hausenblas > > >>>> >> Ireland, Europe > > >>>> >> http://mhausenblas.info/ > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote: > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the > > >>>> >> > build > > >>>> >> system for drill? > > >>>> >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). > > >>>> >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > -david > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning < > [email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> >> I see classes in the source tree: > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/ > > > >>>>parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr > > >>>>qlantlr/autogen > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source code > > >>>>into > > >>>> an > > >>>> >> >> antler source tree. > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov > > >>>> >> >> <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >>> Still work in progress, but anyway - > > >>>> >> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser > > >>>> >> >>> > > >>>> >> >>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome > > >>>> >> >>> > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Sent from my mobile device > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Sent from my mobile device > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >Vladimir Klimontovich > > >Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich > > > > > > > >
