> any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture?
+1
I was about to ask re this as well - pretty please, with sugar on top of it? ;)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Hausenblas
Ireland, Europe
http://mhausenblas.info/
On 13 Sep 2012, at 15:23, NAVEEN MAANJU wrote:
> any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture?
>
> +1 maven
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Arun Yadav <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for maven however, would welcome better option if any.
>> On Sep 13, 2012 2:45 AM, "Ben Flint" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for maven. Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility we're
>>> after.
>>>
>>> On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> What is wrong with good old Ant?
>>>>> I can live with maven too... it just has too many gotchas
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> +1 for maven.
>>>>>> Could those against please suggest alternatives?
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>> Julien
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -1 for maven.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> If build system is evil it's better to build it manually.
>>>>>>>> -1 for maven
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the
>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>> system for drill?
>>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO).
>>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like it
>>>>>>> downloads
>>>>>>>>> half of the Internet every time).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala +
>> SBT
>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive ;)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Michael Hausenblas
>>>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>>>> http://mhausenblas.info/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the
>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>> system for drill?
>>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO).
>>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -david
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning <
>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I see classes in the source tree:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/
>>>
>>>>>> parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr
>>>>>>> qlantlr/autogen
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source code
>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>> antler source tree.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Still work in progress, but anyway -
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Vladimir Klimontovich
>>>> Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
