On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:43:08AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:14:42PM -0300, Afonso Comba de Araujo Neto wrote:
> > And you must also download the latest version of pdfbox.jar (more  
> > specifically 0.7.4) at http://www.pdfbox.org/dist/.
> > 
> > The current 0.7.3 shipped in DSpace have a bug concerning encrypted  
> > files, which is corrected in the latest (unofficial) version.
> 
> This provides a hook for a question I've meant to ask for some time,
> which probably exposes my ignorance of the Java Way.
> 
> Does the product *have* to ship with a gaggle of third-party JARs that
> are often backlevel by the time we get them?

In a word, probably. It is mostly done this way (I assume) for
convenience. There's nothing to stop you doing this for yourself; if you
want it self-managed, then you already know what to do. My expectation
is that if we stopped shipping any JARs we'd get a rather significant
backlash.

Jim


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

Reply via email to