Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 17:24 +0100, Hugo Monteiro a écrit :
> Hi Jullien,

Hi Hugo,

> Sorry for bothering but i wanted to make a suggestion.

Suggestions are always welcome!

> The packages that you have available at your site are based on the GIT 
> version of dspam. While that is great since it provides an easy way for 
> people trying the latests versions, I was wondering if it wouldn't be 
> more sensible to have two branches available. One with git, like you 
> have now and another one with only the official releases. Those tend to 
> be a bit more stable than the devel ones, and usually don't carry any 
> surprises.
> 
> I hope you can take this into consideration.

Well, actually, I wanted to stick with stable releases, while still
working on the development branches in order to be ready to publish
Debian packages just after an official release.

Then, I just realised that I had published packages including features
which weren't included in the 3.9.0 release, and some users asked me to
publish them. My plan is hence to follow development until the 3.9.1
version is released, then keep sticking with stable released only for
Debian stable, while still building development snapshots for
experimental (completely untested though).

However, the real plan is to get DSPAM re-included as an official
package, as DSPAM will be definitely removed from the archive within the
end of the month!!!

I have sent several calls for help on the pkg-dspam mailing list, with
no success at all until now. I do not have the necessary skills to
maintain these packages on my own (and I am a Debian Maintainer - not
Developer - which means I cannot upload the packages myself for now).

Any help is obviously welcome to try and keep DSPAM in the official
archive!

Cheers,
Julien


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Dspam-devel mailing list
Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel

Reply via email to