On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:38:41 +0200 Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> wrote:
> Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 17:24 +0100, Hugo Monteiro a écrit : > > Hi Jullien, > > Hi Hugo, > > > Sorry for bothering but i wanted to make a suggestion. > > Suggestions are always welcome! > > > The packages that you have available at your site are based on the GIT > > version of dspam. While that is great since it provides an easy way for > > people trying the latests versions, I was wondering if it wouldn't be > > more sensible to have two branches available. One with git, like you > > have now and another one with only the official releases. Those tend to > > be a bit more stable than the devel ones, and usually don't carry any > > surprises. > > > > I hope you can take this into consideration. > > Well, actually, I wanted to stick with stable releases, while still > working on the development branches in order to be ready to publish > Debian packages just after an official release. > > Then, I just realised that I had published packages including features > which weren't included in the 3.9.0 release, and some users asked me to > publish them. My plan is hence to follow development until the 3.9.1 > version is released, then keep sticking with stable released only for > Debian stable, while still building development snapshots for > experimental (completely untested though). > > However, the real plan is to get DSPAM re-included as an official > package, as DSPAM will be definitely removed from the archive within the > end of the month!!! > Of this month? WHY? > I have sent several calls for help on the pkg-dspam mailing list, with > no success at all until now. I do not have the necessary skills to > maintain these packages on my own (and I am a Debian Maintainer - not > Developer - which means I cannot upload the packages myself for now). > > Any help is obviously welcome to try and keep DSPAM in the official > archive! > How can we or I help to keep the package in the official archive? > Cheers, > Julien > -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
