Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 21:28 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit :
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:21:18 +0200
> Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> wrote:
[...]
> > 
> > [0] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
> > 
> Ohhh boy. That file is big! 

And it's not the only one available ;)
There's also eg. the Python or Perl policies (for packages using Perl or
Python), other recommendations etc.

> Would it be possible to send me your package in it's source format?
> And is there any other package that you consider to be good quality?
> If you have such a package in source format then send me that as well,
> so I can look at it and see where the big difference is compared to
> the DSPAM package.

That wouldn't bring you anything imho.
I consider the DSPAM packages to be good (there is always things which
can be improved obviously), but they mainly need to be tested (new
install in several setups, upgrades from the existing 3.6.8 packages
etc.).

You can check the current source packages at
http://packages.kirya.net/debian/pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.9.0
+git20100416-1.debian.tar.gz

I work in the SVN repository of the pkg-dspam team, in the development
branch (the experimental is for 3.9.0, but needs to be updated now...)

By the way, any plan to release 3.9.1 soon? Have you defined a specific
roadmap for this minor release?

Cheers,
Julien


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Dspam-devel mailing list
Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel

Reply via email to