On 7/22/2010 6:18 PM, Disconnect wrote: > > That is my point. The old installation instructions were a disaster > (and made it -very- easy to screw up upgrades - "oops, 2 versions ago > you selected these options, and now that you have added this unrelated > option I'm just going to fail to work".) I accept that it may be > better now, and I'm going to consider upgrading instead of just > replacing, but at the end of the day I need something that goes in and > "just works". I don't need it to do a million billion db operations > constantly, I just need it to catch the small amounts of spam that we > accept these days. > I don't want to hijack the thread, but I upgraded to 3.9 a little while ago. I trashed the DB, mostly because I wasn't getting that great of performance out of it for some users and I switched tokenizers. I did upgrade (had to find an ancient source copy from a few versions ago, not an easy task, but by far the most difficult).
I did: make uninstall, configure make, make install, and everything just worked. It was by far the easiest compile I have ever done on a piece of software. Thanks again to Stevan, Paul, and the rest of the team... not having to worry about spam is such a nice feeling. Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
