Nicolas Williams writes: > I see that rm(1) uses unlinkat(2), but I don't see a syscall provider > probe for unlinkat(2). That's... annoying (but there's always the fbt > provider). > > Actually, I don't see any syscall provider probes for any of the > open/unlink/rename/...at[64]() system calls. Is there a CR for this?
It's not actually missing. A quick sunsolve search will get you CR 6590548, which explains that fsat is the actual syscall involved. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list [email protected]
