On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:09:22PM -0500, James Carlson wrote: > Nicolas Williams writes: > > I see that rm(1) uses unlinkat(2), but I don't see a syscall provider > > probe for unlinkat(2). That's... annoying (but there's always the fbt > > provider). > > > > Actually, I don't see any syscall provider probes for any of the > > open/unlink/rename/...at[64]() system calls. Is there a CR for this? > > It's not actually missing. A quick sunsolve search will get you CR > 6590548, which explains that fsat is the actual syscall involved.
Ah. Thanks! _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list [email protected]
