Nicolas Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > unlink(2) and unlinkat(2) are different system calls. unlinkat(2) is
> > actually a
> > subcode (number 5) of the SYS_fsat system call. While it might be confusing
> > to u
> > sers, DTrace isn't going to slap lipstack on that particular pig.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > ---8<---
>
> This pig isn't very attractive. Is a system call number shortage the
> underlying problem? And is the fix to this ultimately about fixing the
> syscall number shortage?
grouping several "syscalls" under a single entry is nothting new.
As long as you stay under the limit of parameters that work fast, I see no
problem with this kind of implementation.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
dtrace-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
