On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 01:34:02PM -0800, Adam Leventhal wrote: > I'm not sure why we don't include the evaluation in the public version, but > here it is: > > ---8<--- > Evaluation > [ahl 8.9.2007] > > unlink(2) and unlinkat(2) are different system calls. unlinkat(2) is actually > a > subcode (number 5) of the SYS_fsat system call. While it might be confusing > to u > sers, DTrace isn't going to slap lipstack on that particular pig. > > [...] > > ---8<---
This pig isn't very attractive. Is a system call number shortage the underlying problem? And is the fix to this ultimately about fixing the syscall number shortage? Nico -- _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list [email protected]
