Thanks Sandra, I couldn't agree more.
The past few weeks have again seemed frustrating for me. Debates about
veggies, animals, that drag on and are repeated every time a new person
comes in; usually wiithout anything new being said (since it seems people
don't bother to check the journal and archive to see what's happened over
the past four years or so). Incessant discussion about Clinton. Sure, the
"inquisition" sucks but:
Seriously, the citizenry needs to recognize and acknowledge that he should
be impeached -- for the illegal war against Iraq; same for Reagan and Bush
-- they too waged illegal wars and should have been impeached.
Now that IS an ecofeminist issue. Why is no one stating the obvious? The
culture war spectacle now on-going in the Senate is a serious distraction
from the immorality of the US military and its genocidal policies against
all sorts of exotic third world peoples. They ALL ought to be impeached.
But, since that is not about to happen, I suggest we focus on other things.
I noticed that Irene Diamond, an important figure in ecofeminist theory,
requested an unsubcription. That seems indicative of the tone this group
has taken. Its sad. I may sign off also.....
Devon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandra Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 4:08 AM
> To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT
> Subject: Re: Dismissal of Clinton case debated
>
> 1) Not all ecofeminists are American.
> 2) America is not the centre of the universe.
>
>
> Please spare me further updates on America's response Clinton's sex
> life. This is not an ecofeminist issue or even a issue of interest at
> all to those of us who don't live in the US of A.
>
> Sandra
